6 Comments - 280 Views - 2 Likes
Artwork Details
|
Description(cont from last page)Even so that job-lot bid would not have been the first three-figure wager I had placed. Once I put an even higher amount of cash backing the table-topping evens-money favourites in a football match hosted by the basement boys. The league leaders could manage only a draw but that meant I lost. I never did anything like that again, as for a week or so after losing I felt very unwell, in all kinds of ways. That was in stark contrast to how I felt when I received the above drawing, part of the job-lot, in the post. I thought I have gotten to the age when I don’t really get so excited about things like I did when I was young, however being in possession of the above resulted in me for the first few days at least walking around in a deliriously light-headed air of exhilaration. If I was not looking at it then I was thinking about it. It was like being in unrequited love; unrequited because it was never going to reciprocate as it was not a living breathing thing; although paradoxically it did seem to sing and dance and have a life of its own. Prior to receiving the drawing I was concerned that it might be just a handcoloured print/photocopy but all my experience of having to operate a state of the art, A3-format, leased photocopier tells me that this is a genuine drawing. The waterproof ink sits proud on the paper like spot varnish on a book cover, and, in spite of what an expert might say, the ink is applied homogeneously – uniform in its thickness, which I assume is the result of decades of rigorous and disciplined practice. I admit that the drawing has a number of issues. It is unsigned, but BWS fans know that he did not even sign all his published New Mutants covers. It is on thin 80gsm copier paper which means that the applied watercolour has wrinkled the paper. There is a 2-3 cm tear in the middle at the top. There is a note to production written directly onto the artwork in the top right. However, this note gives a number of clues as to the identity of the artist. Aside from the very British good manners – using “please” – it has the UK spelling of “colour” and “colouring”. In a brief YouTube video of BWS which is not all that old you can hear him speaking with a perfect English accent even though he has been a US resident for close to half a century, so why shouldn’t he still spell like a Brit? There aren’t many examples of BWS’s lowercase writing on the internet but there is one excerpt on his Storyteller website where he is giving feedback on the Archer and Armstrong logo design and the writing there (especially the lowercase “d”) is not a million miles away from the writing on the drawing. But none of these are “smoking guns”. I cannot see anything in any of the nine issues of Storyteller or the two Opus books which look similar so I would like to ask CAF members if they have any strong opinions about the drawing, or, even better, evidence to prove or disprove it is by BWS. There are some dedicated BWS fans on CAF – BWS inspires devotion in a way that is paralleled by only Frazetta – and there is also a knowledgeable art curator who has some previous with unattributed/misattributed works, not to mention a resident expert who passed on his insight on the questionable authenticity of my Nick Park drawing. I realise asking for help in this way may result in me finding on my face an industrial quantity of egg (or a cheaper food substitute) if the drawing is not by BWS, which may mean me having to take it down; or perhaps I could get special dispensation from Bill to allow me to keep it up as a towering monument to my overarching hubris. You might be thinking why I don’t go directly to the source: BWS has a facebook page and also a website (although I do not know if either is maintained). It is going to take a matter of life or death before I reawaken my dormant facebook account, and in any case I hear that BWS had a serious health issue in recent years and I am not going to disturb him to just satisfy my idle curiousity. This seems like an opportune time to quote Richard Feynman. I wish I could say that Feynman is my preferred reading matter and that comics are my way of only “cleansing my palate” between my usual literary diet of Rovelli, Hawking and Feynman, but the truth is I am quoting, appropriately enough, Jeff Jones quoting Feynman in one of his I’m Age strips: “I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it is much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong”. As at the start of this description I am going to presumptuously claim to speak for many BWS fans when I say that I would be delighted to see new work from him, but if we don’t and instead he has a long and healthy retirement then we would be every bit as happy. His contribution to the artform we love has been immense, and his legacy is assured. We would all like to wish him a very happy birthday and hope that he has very many more of them. Social/Sharing |
About the Owner
|
![]() |
Contact the OwnerUse can use a contact form to send an email to this gallery owner,
|
You must be logged in to make comments.
Marcus Wai
Member Since 2005
Posted on 5/26/2025
Fair gamble if the price is right as you can justify it with the other pieces in the lot.
Simon Ma
Member Since 2013
1 - Posted on 6/14/2025
Marcus Wai wrote:
Fair gamble if the price is right as you can justify it with the other pieces in the lot.
Thank you for your “half-full” reading of the purchase. I will be honest and say that more than half of the drawings (the half they have only partially shown in the thumbnail) are just quick pencil sketches by the same unnamed artist on layout paper and one of those is even just pencilled lettering.The six “showcased” pieces are the only ones with any real value. It was/is a gamble.
Simon Ma
Member Since 2013
1 - Posted on 6/14/2025
Mark Levy wrote:
Love the Jam - I just picked up that I'm Age strip!
Wow, you won that! “Hats off.” They say you should choose your battles and I never stood a chance with that one so I stayed away from it but full credit to you. I have got to that age/state of mind where envy does not come into it and I am just happy that someone else in the CAF community got that page. The Studio artbook (sadly out of print) is a classic and I remember swiping from a Jeff Jones painting in that book for my Art and Design school coursework over *choke* four decades ago. Needless to say, your BWS collection is phenomenal.
Simon Ma
Member Since 2013
Posted on 7/4/2025
Red Raven wrote:
Historic !!
Thank you, but if I had known how historic it was I would have tried to take a better photograph.
All |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Gene Payne The Charlotte (N.C.) Observer Editorial |
![]() |
RON FRENZ AND BRETT BREEDING AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #252 PAGE 8 (1984, HISTORIC 1ST APPEARANCE OF BLACK SUIT! 6TH PANEL IS 1ST TIME SUIT REACTS TO SPIDEY'S THOUGHTS, GIVING 1ST CLUE IT'S A SYMBIOTE!) |
![]() |
Humberto Ramos - Edge of Spider-Verse #3 Variant Cover |
JUDGE DREDD - 2000 AD PROG 197 COMIC MAGAZINE COVER ORIGINAL ART BY BRIAN BOLLAND. |
Classified Updates |
|
Rene Dorenbos9/6/2025 5:20:00 AM |
|
Monty B9/5/2025 3:53:00 PM |
|
Saxa Luna Galianan9/5/2025 1:01:00 PM |
|
Will Gabri-El9/5/2025 12:25:00 PM |
|
Michele M9/5/2025 12:05:00 PM |
|
Keith Veronese9/5/2025 11:09:00 AM |
|
Dealer Updates |
|
Coollines Artwork9/5/2025 9:24:00 PM |
|
Koch Comic Art9/5/2025 7:54:00 PM |
|
Anthony's Comicbook Art9/5/2025 6:43:00 PM |
|
Will's Comic Art Page9/5/2025 12:25:00 PM |
|
Essential Sequential9/5/2025 12:15:00 PM |
|
Achetez de l'Art9/5/2025 12:15:00 PM |
|
|