ADVERTISEMENT
Welcome to ComicArtFans!

The Good Old Days (from 1993 catalog)

Artist: Steve Ditko (Penciller)

16 Comments  -   479 Views  -   1 Like


The Good Old Days (from 1993 catalog) Comic Art
Click Image to View Full Size

 

   

Artwork Details

Title: The Good Old Days (from 1993 catalog)
Artist: Steve Ditko (Penciller)
Media Type: Photograph
Art Type: Other
For Sale Status: NFS
Views: 479
Likes on CAF:
Comments: 16
Added to Site: 2/3/2021
Comic Art Archive:

Description

Pick your poison.


So what Ditko price is more painful? The bargain price of $2800 in 1993, or the 90k I found for a Ditko page online? LOL

First, let me apologize in advance for the pain I am about to inflict on all of you. Especially if you are the current or former owner of any of these pieces. I figured since I have a near complete set of Mitch’s old mail order catalogs, it might be “fun” (if not masochistic) to take a stroll down memory lane. But take heart. For even though most (if not all) of these posts will be almost unbearable and cringe worthy to many of you, just remember that 20-30 years from now, these will be the “good old days” to some new collector just starting out.

I’ve gotten many wonderful compliments from the fine people of CAF about my collection/gallery. All giving me credit for being smart enough to buy all the pieces I bought way back when. Well, now I’m about to show you all what an absolute idiot I was. Keep in mind that many of the pieces that currently reside in my collection came from these very same catalogs. So the next time you want to call me a genius for all the pieces I did buy back then, just take a look at some of the rubbish I DIDN’T buy! In other words, this is the collection I COULD‘VE had. (Somebody shoot me now! LOL)

What is very interesting to note here is that during this 9-year span of catalogs (1984-1993), there is nothing here that is priced over (or anywhere near) $1000. Actually (with the exception of the Killing Joke page), nothing even breaks the $500 range. Absolutely incredible for pieces that could all easily be five figures (or more) today!

By the way, I’ve got dozens and dozens of these. So I’ll be posting them in chunks from time to time (to prolong the torture). >

Social/Sharing


About the Owner

E DLS ( 3 )
Premium Gallery Owner
Joined: March 2005
Last Login: September 2025
Country: UNITED STATES
On CAF:

Premium Member Q&A
E's Classifieds
E's Want List
Artworks Commented On
Liked Art
Site Activity on CAF

Read More About EDLS

Contact the Owner

Use can use a contact form to send an email to this gallery owner,
but, you must be logged in to use this feature.



Comments on this Artwork

You must be logged in to make comments.

J H 
Member Since 2019

Posted on 2/3/2021

I'm not crying, you're crying! $2800...That is both one of the most expensive and one of the most painful. But I still love looking...:)

artless artmore 
Member Since 2013

Posted on 2/4/2021

Well, OK, so maybe my comments on your Idyl posts about "Studio" artists drawing qualitatively higher prices in the 90s than classic superhero art are overstated.  You're a good man to keep records of asking prices from bygone eras!  I have pretty extensive records of Frazetta sales from the dawn of eBay onward, along with the easy to find printed catalogs from earlier times, but I'm not as well versed with the superhero stuff from before the rise of Heritage and the other specialty auction houses.  Thank goodness for the sales records available at HA.com and CAF!

E DLS 
Member Since 2005

Posted on 2/4/2021

artless artmore wrote:

Well, OK, so maybe my comments on your Idyl posts about "Studio" artists drawing qualitatively higher prices in the 90s than classic superhero art are overstated.  You're a good man to keep records of asking prices from bygone eras!  I have pretty extensive records of Frazetta sales from the dawn of eBay onward, along with the easy to find printed catalogs from earlier times, but I'm not as well versed with the superhero stuff from before the rise of Heritage and the other specialty auction houses.  Thank goodness for the sales records available at HA.com and CAF!

Hmm, ultimately I think this is just a fun excercise.  These old prices don't really mean anything.  After all, what's done is done.  And when you think about it, current prices are in a way, almost just as meaningless.  The only time a piece of art becomes worth a stated value is when someone actually hands you that amount for it.  I could say my piece is worth a million dollars, but until someones hands me a mil, it isn't worth squat.  And markets (whether it's art or some other commodity) are so easily manipulated.  If you have a piece by Joe Blow that fetches a record price at auction, inevitably, the very next auction will be littered with Joe Blow pieces.  I've never looked at my art as an investment.  But my hanging on to it for so long might mistakenly give the impression that I do.  I don't even like to think of my art in monetary terms.  When I associate numbers with artwork, it means only one of two things.  It's either the number it will take for me to acquire it, or it's the number it will take for me to let go of it.  Otherwise, numbers don't even enter my mind.  Only when I'm forced to think in those terms.  Once I pay the price for a piece of art and it's in my collection, I try never to think of that number again.  Just a means to an end.  So yeah, it's fun to trace the numbers history of these pieces.  But at some point, getting too analytical about it makes it more work than fun.  Although I certainly understand that some people just have that mindset.  Nothing wrong with that.  If nothing else, it can make for some interesting discussions.

artless artmore 
Member Since 2013

Posted on 2/5/2021

E DLS wrote:

Hmm, ultimately I think this is just a fun excercise.  These old prices don't really mean anything.  After all, what's done is done.  And when you think about it, current prices are in a way, almost just as meaningless.  The only time a piece of art becomes worth a stated value is when someone actually hands you that amount for it.  I could say my piece is worth a million dollars, but until someones hands me a mil, it isn't worth squat.  And markets (whether it's art or some other commodity) are so easily manipulated.  If you have a piece by Joe Blow that fetches a record price at auction, inevitably, the very next auction will be littered with Joe Blow pieces.  I've never looked at my art as an investment.  But my hanging on to it for so long might mistakenly give the impression that I do.  I don't even like to think of my art in monetary terms.  When I associate numbers with artwork, it means only one of two things.  It's either the number it will take for me to acquire it, or it's the number it will take for me to let go of it.  Otherwise, numbers don't even enter my mind.  Only when I'm forced to think in those terms.  Once I pay the price for a piece of art and it's in my collection, I try never to think of that number again.  Just a means to an end.  So yeah, it's fun to trace the numbers history of these pieces.  But at some point, getting too analytical about it makes it more work than fun.  Although I certainly understand that some people just have that mindset.  Nothing wrong with that.  If nothing else, it can make for some interesting discussions.

I'm with you that it's a good policy not to buy art with the expectation that it will take us to a comfortable retirement without making other arrangements, but I don't think the numbers are meaningless.  Perhaps the most important thing I learn when I see modest price tags for stuff I passed up on years ago that's worth a mint now is that I have little predictive power, so I should indeed cleave to my usual twin mantras 1) buy what I like & 2) buy what I can afford, rather than treating it as an investment.  That said, I know collectors much savvier than I who have made a killing in a short period of time, and they only deal in art by artists they love, so one can come out way ahead in short order and not compromise on aesthetic satisfaction.  I'm no business man, so I just make sure I'm tickled pink by whatever I acquire.  I think we can also learn something about the way the market works by studying past prices.  At my advanced age, at which point I should really know better, I managed to miss out on several pieces over the past couple years because I serially underestimate how quickly prices rise on the good stuff.  So now I find myself contemplating spending twice as much on pieces I could have had very recently, and that means getting half as many pieces for the same art budget I'm limited to, independent of whatever they might be worth in the future.  In any case, I've certainly enjoyed your nostalgic and educational posts!!

E DLS 
Member Since 2005

Posted on 2/5/2021

artless artmore wrote:

I'm with you that it's a good policy not to buy art with the expectation that it will take us to a comfortable retirement without making other arrangements, but I don't think the numbers are meaningless.  Perhaps the most important thing I learn when I see modest price tags for stuff I passed up on years ago that's worth a mint now is that I have little predictive power, so I should indeed cleave to my usual twin mantras 1) buy what I like & 2) buy what I can afford, rather than treating it as an investment.  That said, I know collectors much savvier than I who have made a killing in a short period of time, and they only deal in art by artists they love, so one can come out way ahead in short order and not compromise on aesthetic satisfaction.  I'm no business man, so I just make sure I'm tickled pink by whatever I acquire.  I think we can also learn something about the way the market works by studying past prices.  At my advanced age, at which point I should really know better, I managed to miss out on several pieces over the past couple years because I serially underestimate how quickly prices rise on the good stuff.  So now I find myself contemplating spending twice as much on pieces I could have had very recently, and that means getting half as many pieces for the same art budget I'm limited to, independent of whatever they might be worth in the future.  In any case, I've certainly enjoyed your nostalgic and educational posts!!

So the one thing that stood out for me in your comment was your twin mantras.  When you think about it, they help make my point.  If we buy what we love and don't treat them as investments, then the numbers (old or new) DON'T really matter.  Correct?  I guess for me it's kind of like Jeopardy (miss you Alex).  It's fun to have a lot of general knowledge, but not as much fun when it becomes more of a study.  Of course as I say this, I also make it a point to tell new or young collectors to learn as much as they can.  Anyway my main and final point is, if we follow your mantras (and they're probably the only two you need), then it doesn't matter if the pieces you buy sky rocket in price or become completely worthless.  Because what you love about them has nothing to do with dollars.

By the way, I just want to take this opportunity to say how much I really appreciate and enjoy your comments.  They're always interesting and well thought out.  This began as sort of a silly project, but I had no idea how much fun it would become.  The response has been surprising to say the least.  Anyway, thanks for being so engaged.  I think if you and I were able in a room together, it would be an invigorating conversation.  But even in this limited format, I truly appreciate you sharing your wisdom and passion.  Thanks!

artless artmore 
Member Since 2013

Posted on 2/7/2021

E DLS wrote:

So the one thing that stood out for me in your comment was your twin mantras.  When you think about it, they help make my point.  If we buy what we love and don't treat them as investments, then the numbers (old or new) DON'T really matter.  Correct?  I guess for me it's kind of like Jeopardy (miss you Alex).  It's fun to have a lot of general knowledge, but not as much fun when it becomes more of a study.  Of course as I say this, I also make it a point to tell new or young collectors to learn as much as they can.  Anyway my main and final point is, if we follow your mantras (and they're probably the only two you need), then it doesn't matter if the pieces you buy sky rocket in price or become completely worthless.  Because what you love about them has nothing to do with dollars.

By the way, I just want to take this opportunity to say how much I really appreciate and enjoy your comments.  They're always interesting and well thought out.  This began as sort of a silly project, but I had no idea how much fun it would become.  The response has been surprising to say the least.  Anyway, thanks for being so engaged.  I think if you and I were able in a room together, it would be an invigorating conversation.  But even in this limited format, I truly appreciate you sharing your wisdom and passion.  Thanks!

It's been super fun spitballin' with you re historical OA pricing trends, smart choices, regrets, nostalgia, and life lessons learned. 

Of course, you're correct that my twin mantras were designed to keep me from thinking of collecting as investing, in part because I didn't want to dig myself into a financial hole with wild speculation and unfettered spending, but more because I didn't want to become consumed by collecting as an end in itself --- I fancied myself as an artist and having a couple original Frazettas on the wall would contribute to my art education.  Now that I see how high OA prices can go, and now that I'm too old to continue pretending retirement is still a lifetime away, I see how picking up a few more pieces from a couple other artists whose work was still cheap back then might have been a wise move, even if the "educational value" might not have been as great as for the Frazetta pieces (IMHO). 

The thing that gets me about the Wrightson Frankenstein plates is that they rise to the level of art I might have been willing to spend on back in the day had I been tuned into the OA market.  I did go to a con way back in 1984, but it was a local affair with a couple sketches and minor pieces available, nothing major.  I saw one color guide for the first page of the first appearance of Elektra by Frank Miller, and I rushed over only to find that it wasn't OA, but that put the idea in my head that original pages could be had at conventions.  I didn't make it to another con until '95 in San Diego, and I went every year after that till the early 2000s, and I picked up a couple things, but with the idea of getting what would help my drawing.  It was already too late by then to get the best high-end examples of Frazetta or Wrightson at prices I could afford, but as your posts make clear, lots of fantastic comic art by other greats could have been had for a song back then if I weren't such a snob at that time.  That includes lots of pieces I would love to have on my wall now regardless of cost. 

Well, I'm sure I'm repeating myself here... you're kind to have read this far.  No good deed goes unpunished, so I'll hit you with a few more unhinged ramblings:

artless artmore 
Member Since 2013

Posted on 2/7/2021

artless artmore wrote:

It's been super fun spitballin' with you re historical OA pricing trends, smart choices, regrets, nostalgia, and life lessons learned. 

Of course, you're correct that my twin mantras were designed to keep me from thinking of collecting as investing, in part because I didn't want to dig myself into a financial hole with wild speculation and unfettered spending, but more because I didn't want to become consumed by collecting as an end in itself --- I fancied myself as an artist and having a couple original Frazettas on the wall would contribute to my art education.  Now that I see how high OA prices can go, and now that I'm too old to continue pretending retirement is still a lifetime away, I see how picking up a few more pieces from a couple other artists whose work was still cheap back then might have been a wise move, even if the "educational value" might not have been as great as for the Frazetta pieces (IMHO). 

The thing that gets me about the Wrightson Frankenstein plates is that they rise to the level of art I might have been willing to spend on back in the day had I been tuned into the OA market.  I did go to a con way back in 1984, but it was a local affair with a couple sketches and minor pieces available, nothing major.  I saw one color guide for the first page of the first appearance of Elektra by Frank Miller, and I rushed over only to find that it wasn't OA, but that put the idea in my head that original pages could be had at conventions.  I didn't make it to another con until '95 in San Diego, and I went every year after that till the early 2000s, and I picked up a couple things, but with the idea of getting what would help my drawing.  It was already too late by then to get the best high-end examples of Frazetta or Wrightson at prices I could afford, but as your posts make clear, lots of fantastic comic art by other greats could have been had for a song back then if I weren't such a snob at that time.  That includes lots of pieces I would love to have on my wall now regardless of cost. 

Well, I'm sure I'm repeating myself here... you're kind to have read this far.  No good deed goes unpunished, so I'll hit you with a few more unhinged ramblings:

While I'm self-indulgently jawing at you, here are some lingering (and pretty obvious) big questions that keep me up in the wee hours:  

1)  Are any current up-and-coming artists' original pages going to experience the same runaway value increases just as was the case for the best (and/or most popular...) comic artists in previous eras?  Again, this is important not just for investment's sake, but it would mean you have to figure out what will matter to you later in life and act now if you might want one of these pages on your wall in a few years.

2)  To what extent are the nutty OA prices we see now due to old, rich guys spending on nostalgic pieces from their childhoods?  Obviously, that's part of it, but given the recent interest in Krazy Kat, Carol Day, early Golden Age pages, and other books & strips from before most collector's living memories, I wonder if values might just continue to rise indefinitely.  

3)  Will the US enter a period of (hyper?) inflation or (gasp) deflation as the national debt continues to soar and we slowly dig our way out of the pandemic etc.  I could imagine OA prices going up or down in response to a market crash, with inflation/deflation playing a key role.  The skyrocketing hammer prices for key baseball cards (i.e., tiny, mass-produced rectangles of cardboard...) and slabbed (!) videogames, for instance, suggests to me that all collectibles are overperforming right now while the stock market is sky high and folks who didn't lose their jobs at the start of the pandemic just can't spend their surplus money on their usual pursuit while they're stuck at home.

4)  Are we now still in the same modern comic "age" that started in the 90s or will we look back a decade from now and say that we had entered a new phase in the history of comics?

5)  What fraction of comic artist will be producing physical pages of art 10+ years from now? 

6)  Will comic books still exist as an artform 25+ years from now?  I think new comics in some form will be created for as long as human society exists, but even if that's true, it's conceivable that it will become marginalized.  I don't know how many people currently read new comics, but it's true that many current movies are based on comics, albeit older comic storylines in many cases.

OK, I better get back to work (can you tell I'm procrastinating?).

E DLS 
Member Since 2005

Posted on 2/7/2021

artless artmore wrote:

While I'm self-indulgently jawing at you, here are some lingering (and pretty obvious) big questions that keep me up in the wee hours:  

1)  Are any current up-and-coming artists' original pages going to experience the same runaway value increases just as was the case for the best (and/or most popular...) comic artists in previous eras?  Again, this is important not just for investment's sake, but it would mean you have to figure out what will matter to you later in life and act now if you might want one of these pages on your wall in a few years.

2)  To what extent are the nutty OA prices we see now due to old, rich guys spending on nostalgic pieces from their childhoods?  Obviously, that's part of it, but given the recent interest in Krazy Kat, Carol Day, early Golden Age pages, and other books & strips from before most collector's living memories, I wonder if values might just continue to rise indefinitely.  

3)  Will the US enter a period of (hyper?) inflation or (gasp) deflation as the national debt continues to soar and we slowly dig our way out of the pandemic etc.  I could imagine OA prices going up or down in response to a market crash, with inflation/deflation playing a key role.  The skyrocketing hammer prices for key baseball cards (i.e., tiny, mass-produced rectangles of cardboard...) and slabbed (!) videogames, for instance, suggests to me that all collectibles are overperforming right now while the stock market is sky high and folks who didn't lose their jobs at the start of the pandemic just can't spend their surplus money on their usual pursuit while they're stuck at home.

4)  Are we now still in the same modern comic "age" that started in the 90s or will we look back a decade from now and say that we had entered a new phase in the history of comics?

5)  What fraction of comic artist will be producing physical pages of art 10+ years from now? 

6)  Will comic books still exist as an artform 25+ years from now?  I think new comics in some form will be created for as long as human society exists, but even if that's true, it's conceivable that it will become marginalized.  I don't know how many people currently read new comics, but it's true that many current movies are based on comics, albeit older comic storylines in many cases.

OK, I better get back to work (can you tell I'm procrastinating?).

COME ON!!!!!  This is SO unfair.  You can't pose these types of thought provoking questions in such a limited format venue.  I mean, any ONE of these questions would generate a few hours of discussion, at least.  I don't even know where to start.  My first instinct is to jump right in and start typing, but I know I would only run out of time and space.  This really sucks!  So I'll think on it a bit and see if I can come up with some responses that this space will accommodate.  But boy, if you only knew how fast my mind was racing.  Again, great questions.  Just wish you were here sitting on my couch when you asked them.  LOL

E DLS 
Member Since 2005

Posted on 3/4/2021

artless artmore wrote:

While I'm self-indulgently jawing at you, here are some lingering (and pretty obvious) big questions that keep me up in the wee hours:  

1)  Are any current up-and-coming artists' original pages going to experience the same runaway value increases just as was the case for the best (and/or most popular...) comic artists in previous eras?  Again, this is important not just for investment's sake, but it would mean you have to figure out what will matter to you later in life and act now if you might want one of these pages on your wall in a few years.

2)  To what extent are the nutty OA prices we see now due to old, rich guys spending on nostalgic pieces from their childhoods?  Obviously, that's part of it, but given the recent interest in Krazy Kat, Carol Day, early Golden Age pages, and other books & strips from before most collector's living memories, I wonder if values might just continue to rise indefinitely.  

3)  Will the US enter a period of (hyper?) inflation or (gasp) deflation as the national debt continues to soar and we slowly dig our way out of the pandemic etc.  I could imagine OA prices going up or down in response to a market crash, with inflation/deflation playing a key role.  The skyrocketing hammer prices for key baseball cards (i.e., tiny, mass-produced rectangles of cardboard...) and slabbed (!) videogames, for instance, suggests to me that all collectibles are overperforming right now while the stock market is sky high and folks who didn't lose their jobs at the start of the pandemic just can't spend their surplus money on their usual pursuit while they're stuck at home.

4)  Are we now still in the same modern comic "age" that started in the 90s or will we look back a decade from now and say that we had entered a new phase in the history of comics?

5)  What fraction of comic artist will be producing physical pages of art 10+ years from now? 

6)  Will comic books still exist as an artform 25+ years from now?  I think new comics in some form will be created for as long as human society exists, but even if that's true, it's conceivable that it will become marginalized.  I don't know how many people currently read new comics, but it's true that many current movies are based on comics, albeit older comic storylines in many cases.

OK, I better get back to work (can you tell I'm procrastinating?).

As to your first question.  I think it’s difficult to apply the same logic to the current art market, as one would to previous periods.  During the initial art boom, the market was responding to what the collectors were doing.  Today, collectors are responding to what the market is doing.  And not only collectors, but artists and their reps.  We all know new artists, with new reps and new websites, are popping up like mushrooms.  These new artists have zero track records, but their reps don’t seem to care because some of the art prices for unproven and unknown names are pretty crazy.  And because the market may be healthy right now, collectors are buying into that.  Does that make these artists runaway successes?  I suppose it would make sense to ask what your example of a runaway success is.  I honestly don’t know if there IS such a thing.  After all, there has to be an initial impact in order to generate the ripples.  Did anyone really care about Miller DD art before Dark Knight?  The fact that Mitch was selling DD covers for about $300 before DK hit, makes that point.  I mean, we’re talking about Frank Miller here.  Today, I could pick any one of the new art sites and not be able to tell you a single thing about any of the artists there.  So who is determining those values?  Not me, not you.  And since they’re new and have no track record for previous art sales, you can’t attribute it to their individual market, because they don’t even have one.  So who is coming up with those prices?  What’s that old saying?  We’ll make it up as we go along.  Ultimately, I don’t really know how to answer your question.  I guess I’ll just wait for a new guy to come along with his own Dark Knight or Killing Joke, and say THAT GUY, that’s the next runaway success.  LOL 

E DLS 
Member Since 2005

Posted on 3/6/2021

artless artmore wrote:

While I'm self-indulgently jawing at you, here are some lingering (and pretty obvious) big questions that keep me up in the wee hours:  

1)  Are any current up-and-coming artists' original pages going to experience the same runaway value increases just as was the case for the best (and/or most popular...) comic artists in previous eras?  Again, this is important not just for investment's sake, but it would mean you have to figure out what will matter to you later in life and act now if you might want one of these pages on your wall in a few years.

2)  To what extent are the nutty OA prices we see now due to old, rich guys spending on nostalgic pieces from their childhoods?  Obviously, that's part of it, but given the recent interest in Krazy Kat, Carol Day, early Golden Age pages, and other books & strips from before most collector's living memories, I wonder if values might just continue to rise indefinitely.  

3)  Will the US enter a period of (hyper?) inflation or (gasp) deflation as the national debt continues to soar and we slowly dig our way out of the pandemic etc.  I could imagine OA prices going up or down in response to a market crash, with inflation/deflation playing a key role.  The skyrocketing hammer prices for key baseball cards (i.e., tiny, mass-produced rectangles of cardboard...) and slabbed (!) videogames, for instance, suggests to me that all collectibles are overperforming right now while the stock market is sky high and folks who didn't lose their jobs at the start of the pandemic just can't spend their surplus money on their usual pursuit while they're stuck at home.

4)  Are we now still in the same modern comic "age" that started in the 90s or will we look back a decade from now and say that we had entered a new phase in the history of comics?

5)  What fraction of comic artist will be producing physical pages of art 10+ years from now? 

6)  Will comic books still exist as an artform 25+ years from now?  I think new comics in some form will be created for as long as human society exists, but even if that's true, it's conceivable that it will become marginalized.  I don't know how many people currently read new comics, but it's true that many current movies are based on comics, albeit older comic storylines in many cases.

OK, I better get back to work (can you tell I'm procrastinating?).

As to question 2.  While I would agree that a significant portion of the (how did you put it) “nutty OA prices” are nostalgia driven, this ultimately won’t affect the longevity or sustainability of the market.  Yes, there will be a generational finality for certain periods of art.  At some point, everyone who was reading comics during the Golden Age, the Silver Age, and even the Bronze Age will die.  But if you’re wondering how this will affect the hobby long term, let me just point out one glaring example of its inconsequence.  I’m pretty sure that the person who shelled out 450 million for the DaVinci a few years back, wasn’t around when Leonardi painted it.  See where I’m going here?

E DLS 
Member Since 2005

Posted on 3/10/2021

artless artmore wrote:

While I'm self-indulgently jawing at you, here are some lingering (and pretty obvious) big questions that keep me up in the wee hours:  

1)  Are any current up-and-coming artists' original pages going to experience the same runaway value increases just as was the case for the best (and/or most popular...) comic artists in previous eras?  Again, this is important not just for investment's sake, but it would mean you have to figure out what will matter to you later in life and act now if you might want one of these pages on your wall in a few years.

2)  To what extent are the nutty OA prices we see now due to old, rich guys spending on nostalgic pieces from their childhoods?  Obviously, that's part of it, but given the recent interest in Krazy Kat, Carol Day, early Golden Age pages, and other books & strips from before most collector's living memories, I wonder if values might just continue to rise indefinitely.  

3)  Will the US enter a period of (hyper?) inflation or (gasp) deflation as the national debt continues to soar and we slowly dig our way out of the pandemic etc.  I could imagine OA prices going up or down in response to a market crash, with inflation/deflation playing a key role.  The skyrocketing hammer prices for key baseball cards (i.e., tiny, mass-produced rectangles of cardboard...) and slabbed (!) videogames, for instance, suggests to me that all collectibles are overperforming right now while the stock market is sky high and folks who didn't lose their jobs at the start of the pandemic just can't spend their surplus money on their usual pursuit while they're stuck at home.

4)  Are we now still in the same modern comic "age" that started in the 90s or will we look back a decade from now and say that we had entered a new phase in the history of comics?

5)  What fraction of comic artist will be producing physical pages of art 10+ years from now? 

6)  Will comic books still exist as an artform 25+ years from now?  I think new comics in some form will be created for as long as human society exists, but even if that's true, it's conceivable that it will become marginalized.  I don't know how many people currently read new comics, but it's true that many current movies are based on comics, albeit older comic storylines in many cases.

OK, I better get back to work (can you tell I'm procrastinating?).

As to question 3.  I took one Economics class in college, which I promptly dropped.  And even if I hadn’t, I would still hesitate to attempt any sort of analysis or speculation as to what the economy may or may not do.  Additionally, not being a collector of anything slabbed (whether it be baseball cards, video games, or comics), I can’t accurately speak to the market for those items either.  But having been an original comic art collector for 40 years, I’d like to think I’m somewhat qualified to reflect on its proven track record.  People have been predicting its collapse for years.  Yet it survived both the dot com crash and the housing market crisis.  I still remember hearing about one collector who, after losing his home, realized the only thing of left of value was hanging on his walls.  It was such a horrible time, but if you had a nice art collection, you might have been better off living in a cardboard box than in a nice new house.  I won’t go so far as to say this hobby is indestructible.  But at this point, you have to wonder just what it would take to kill it. 

E DLS 
Member Since 2005

Posted on 3/13/2021

artless artmore wrote:

While I'm self-indulgently jawing at you, here are some lingering (and pretty obvious) big questions that keep me up in the wee hours:  

1)  Are any current up-and-coming artists' original pages going to experience the same runaway value increases just as was the case for the best (and/or most popular...) comic artists in previous eras?  Again, this is important not just for investment's sake, but it would mean you have to figure out what will matter to you later in life and act now if you might want one of these pages on your wall in a few years.

2)  To what extent are the nutty OA prices we see now due to old, rich guys spending on nostalgic pieces from their childhoods?  Obviously, that's part of it, but given the recent interest in Krazy Kat, Carol Day, early Golden Age pages, and other books & strips from before most collector's living memories, I wonder if values might just continue to rise indefinitely.  

3)  Will the US enter a period of (hyper?) inflation or (gasp) deflation as the national debt continues to soar and we slowly dig our way out of the pandemic etc.  I could imagine OA prices going up or down in response to a market crash, with inflation/deflation playing a key role.  The skyrocketing hammer prices for key baseball cards (i.e., tiny, mass-produced rectangles of cardboard...) and slabbed (!) videogames, for instance, suggests to me that all collectibles are overperforming right now while the stock market is sky high and folks who didn't lose their jobs at the start of the pandemic just can't spend their surplus money on their usual pursuit while they're stuck at home.

4)  Are we now still in the same modern comic "age" that started in the 90s or will we look back a decade from now and say that we had entered a new phase in the history of comics?

5)  What fraction of comic artist will be producing physical pages of art 10+ years from now? 

6)  Will comic books still exist as an artform 25+ years from now?  I think new comics in some form will be created for as long as human society exists, but even if that's true, it's conceivable that it will become marginalized.  I don't know how many people currently read new comics, but it's true that many current movies are based on comics, albeit older comic storylines in many cases.

OK, I better get back to work (can you tell I'm procrastinating?).

As to question 4.  I’m sure at some point, the term “modern age” simply won’t suffice.  It’s been what?  Almost 40 years since the end of the Bronze Age?  The previous 40 years are comprised of three different eras (Golden, Silver, and Bronze).  Yet we have only one category for the last four decades?  Doesn’t seem right.  Everything can’t simply be lumped together as Modern.  The rise of Image alone, deserves to be noted (as loathe as I am to admit it).  I don’t know how the periods will be divided or named, but I’m sure some comic historian will come along and take care of that.  Although apparently, there seems to be no great hurry or concern. 

E DLS 
Member Since 2005

Posted on 3/18/2021

artless artmore wrote:

While I'm self-indulgently jawing at you, here are some lingering (and pretty obvious) big questions that keep me up in the wee hours:  

1)  Are any current up-and-coming artists' original pages going to experience the same runaway value increases just as was the case for the best (and/or most popular...) comic artists in previous eras?  Again, this is important not just for investment's sake, but it would mean you have to figure out what will matter to you later in life and act now if you might want one of these pages on your wall in a few years.

2)  To what extent are the nutty OA prices we see now due to old, rich guys spending on nostalgic pieces from their childhoods?  Obviously, that's part of it, but given the recent interest in Krazy Kat, Carol Day, early Golden Age pages, and other books & strips from before most collector's living memories, I wonder if values might just continue to rise indefinitely.  

3)  Will the US enter a period of (hyper?) inflation or (gasp) deflation as the national debt continues to soar and we slowly dig our way out of the pandemic etc.  I could imagine OA prices going up or down in response to a market crash, with inflation/deflation playing a key role.  The skyrocketing hammer prices for key baseball cards (i.e., tiny, mass-produced rectangles of cardboard...) and slabbed (!) videogames, for instance, suggests to me that all collectibles are overperforming right now while the stock market is sky high and folks who didn't lose their jobs at the start of the pandemic just can't spend their surplus money on their usual pursuit while they're stuck at home.

4)  Are we now still in the same modern comic "age" that started in the 90s or will we look back a decade from now and say that we had entered a new phase in the history of comics?

5)  What fraction of comic artist will be producing physical pages of art 10+ years from now? 

6)  Will comic books still exist as an artform 25+ years from now?  I think new comics in some form will be created for as long as human society exists, but even if that's true, it's conceivable that it will become marginalized.  I don't know how many people currently read new comics, but it's true that many current movies are based on comics, albeit older comic storylines in many cases.

OK, I better get back to work (can you tell I'm procrastinating?).

As to question 5.  This is perhaps my favorite question.  If posed in “dog years” it might actually be even more interesting.  But in human years, a decade isn’t all that long.  At this point, I believe there is still a substantial portion of the industry who work old school.  I’ll be the first to admit that I don’t know the numbers for artists working digital only.  I’ll take a guess and say it’s relatively small.  Will it grow in ten years?  Of course?  But will it bring about the demise of physical pages?  Probably not.  It will most likely have more to do with the comics industry than the individual creators.  It might end up being the publishers themselves who determine that eliminating physical materials is a cost saving benefit on the production end.  Printing and publishing costs could also be reduced by going digital.  The film and music industry are perfect examples.  File sharing, downloading, and streaming, have been going on for years.  But people still buy CD’s and DVD’s (me among them).  And guess what?  Even vinyl is making a comeback?  LOL!  The most important thing to remember (as it pertains to where and why this conversation is being had), is that artists know how much money there is to be made from selling originals.  Why would they throw away free money?  Last, but not least, in terms of physical art, I don’t think we should underestimate the appeal of its tactile properties.  I think holding a piece of art while admiring it will always go hand in hand. 

E DLS 
Member Since 2005

Posted on 3/20/2021

artless artmore wrote:

While I'm self-indulgently jawing at you, here are some lingering (and pretty obvious) big questions that keep me up in the wee hours:  

1)  Are any current up-and-coming artists' original pages going to experience the same runaway value increases just as was the case for the best (and/or most popular...) comic artists in previous eras?  Again, this is important not just for investment's sake, but it would mean you have to figure out what will matter to you later in life and act now if you might want one of these pages on your wall in a few years.

2)  To what extent are the nutty OA prices we see now due to old, rich guys spending on nostalgic pieces from their childhoods?  Obviously, that's part of it, but given the recent interest in Krazy Kat, Carol Day, early Golden Age pages, and other books & strips from before most collector's living memories, I wonder if values might just continue to rise indefinitely.  

3)  Will the US enter a period of (hyper?) inflation or (gasp) deflation as the national debt continues to soar and we slowly dig our way out of the pandemic etc.  I could imagine OA prices going up or down in response to a market crash, with inflation/deflation playing a key role.  The skyrocketing hammer prices for key baseball cards (i.e., tiny, mass-produced rectangles of cardboard...) and slabbed (!) videogames, for instance, suggests to me that all collectibles are overperforming right now while the stock market is sky high and folks who didn't lose their jobs at the start of the pandemic just can't spend their surplus money on their usual pursuit while they're stuck at home.

4)  Are we now still in the same modern comic "age" that started in the 90s or will we look back a decade from now and say that we had entered a new phase in the history of comics?

5)  What fraction of comic artist will be producing physical pages of art 10+ years from now? 

6)  Will comic books still exist as an artform 25+ years from now?  I think new comics in some form will be created for as long as human society exists, but even if that's true, it's conceivable that it will become marginalized.  I don't know how many people currently read new comics, but it's true that many current movies are based on comics, albeit older comic storylines in many cases.

OK, I better get back to work (can you tell I'm procrastinating?).

Finally, question 6.  Will COMICS exist 25 years from now?  Without a doubt.  Will comic BOOKS exist 25 years from now?  That’s another question.  The art form will exist for as long as there are stories to tell and people who want to tell them.  But certain FORMATS of the art form will certainly change or disappear.  I think the huge success of comic book movies, has given the comic industry a HUGE boost.  Regardless of the fact that most are adapted from older material.  The logic being that eventually, as more movies are made, adaptations will progress up the timeline as well.  As long as comics are used for movie fodder, and as long as those movies make money, the comic industry will be safe.  But now their existence is tied together.  If the movies start to tank (and they will, if the current over saturation is not addressed), the collapse of the genre could topple the comic industry right along with it.  However, as it relates to your question, I don’t think it will happen in the next 25 years.  Or even 50.  Beyond that, it’s a crap shoot.  I’ll be gone by then, so you’ll have to let me know how it plays out when we meet up in the afterlife.  LOL 

Now that I’m finished with your thought provoking and wonderfully relevant questions, let me just say how much I appreciate your being so engaged in this dialog.  Since I stopped working, I haven’t had much cause to use my noggin for anything remotely exciting or stimulating.  So I really want to thank you for getting my synapses firing again.  Been a while since my brain had such a good workout. 

Peter Sullivan 
Member Since 2006

Posted on 3/27/2021

Its late Ditko Spider-Man. I mean, at this stage, just before his last issue working on the title, he was winding down. I presume whatever arguements he was having with Stan Lee ( the guy who did not give enough credit for years to the artists, who in many cases were co writing the work) caused him to lower the bar from Olympian heights. Can you truly say this is as good as earlier work on the series? Still better than most art on the site. No, I would not have bought this at the time. I would have searched for an earlier page. For this price you would have got a super duper example.

E DLS 
Member Since 2005

Posted on 3/27/2021

Peter Sullivan wrote:

Its late Ditko Spider-Man. I mean, at this stage, just before his last issue working on the title, he was winding down. I presume whatever arguements he was having with Stan Lee ( the guy who did not give enough credit for years to the artists, who in many cases were co writing the work) caused him to lower the bar from Olympian heights. Can you truly say this is as good as earlier work on the series? Still better than most art on the site. No, I would not have bought this at the time. I would have searched for an earlier page. For this price you would have got a super duper example.

Hmm, I think this is both a yes and no for me (and I realize that's cheating).  Knowing what I knew THEN (and my knowledge of Ditko art and that market was severely limited), I would not, and obviously didn't, buy it.  But if we're doing the time machine thing, and knowing what I know NOW, I would go back and do the $2800.  You have to understand that back in the early 90's, $2800 was almost my entire budget for the 5 days of Comic Con.  So this would have been a lot of money for me at the time (especially for one piece of art).  That being said, even if I could find a better (and earlier) Ditko example today, I doubt very much if I could even afford it at all.  So when I look at this page, I see six Ditko panels with Spidey in five ot them, for $2800.  Today, even the worst Ditko page would be ten times that.  Which brings me back to the beginning.  The collector I was in 1993 would not buy it, but the collector I am today would absolutely buy it.  And yes, I know that's cheating.  LOL

Latest Updates

All

Juanma Alonso

9/8/2025 5:42:00 AM

Julien K

9/8/2025 5:21:00 AM

Jeffrey Wedding

9/8/2025 4:59:00 AM

Peter Venkman

9/8/2025 4:49:00 AM

David Cabeza

9/8/2025 4:38:00 AM

 

Marzio Frei

9/8/2025 4:22:00 AM

Franck M

9/8/2025 4:03:00 AM

Michael McIsaac

9/8/2025 4:00:00 AM

Joe Murray

9/8/2025 3:47:00 AM

G. Masip

9/8/2025 3:17:00 AM




eBay Auctions ADVERTISEMENT

MAD #345 p. 42 - Spy vs. Spy Original Art

Heritage Auctions

Jim Craig and John Tartaglione Master of Kung Fu #

ComicLink Auctions

JIM LEE PUNISHER WAR JOURNAL #4 COVER (1989, FLASHBACK TO THE VIETNAM WAR)

Comic Connect Auctions

Neal Adams - The Avengers #96, Page 11

Hakes Auctions

SUPERMAN: THE MAN OF STEEL SOURCEBOOK RPG BOOK COVER ORIGINAL ART BY DAN JURGENS.
















Subscribe to the YouTube Channel.. FREE!




Featured Art Rep
Modern Mythology Comic Art Logo Modern Mythology Comic Art
11 Repped Artists
1 Accepting Commissions
Reilly
Smith
Cermak
Caldwell
Dalhouse
Erwin

 

Commission an Artist


For Sale Updates

Classified Updates

Michael  McIsaac

9/8/2025 4:00:00 AM

Will Gabri-El

9/7/2025 10:28:00 PM

Dan Goodsell

9/7/2025 5:50:00 PM

M Y-C

9/7/2025 4:15:00 PM

Nikolaos K

9/7/2025 3:59:00 PM

Peter Marino

9/7/2025 3:28:00 PM

Dealer Updates

Will's Comic Art Page

9/7/2025 12:25:00 PM

Val Semeiks

9/7/2025 12:15:00 PM

Kirby's Comic Art

9/7/2025 12:15:00 PM

Essential Sequential

9/7/2025 12:15:00 PM

Achetez de l'Art

9/7/2025 12:15:00 PM

Galerie Daniel Maghen

9/7/2025 12:15:00 PM





Become a Premium CAF Gallery Owner & you'll be supporting CAF and also gain access to many services and features not available to standard members.

  • Sell Artwork in the CAF Classifieds
  • Daily Email Alerts based on your own Searches
  • Follow Other Gallery Owners
  • 6 Months Market Data Access
  • Larger Image Uploads ... and Much More!