Artwork Details
|
DescriptionFirst, let me apologize in advance for the pain I am about to inflict on all of you. Especially if you are the current or former owner of any of these pieces. I figured since I have a near complete set of Mitch’s old mail order catalogs, it might be “fun” (if not masochistic) to take a stroll down memory lane. But take heart. For even though most (if not all) of these posts will be almost unbearable and cringe worthy to many of you, just remember that 20-30 years from now, these will be the “good old days” to some new collector just starting out.
What is very interesting to note here is that during this 9-year span of catalogs (1984-1993), there is nothing here that is priced over (or anywhere near) $1000. Actually (with the exception of the Killing Joke page), nothing even breaks the $500 range. Absolutely incredible for pieces that could all easily be five figures (or more) today! By the way, I’ve got dozens and dozens of these. So I’ll be posting them in chunks from time to time (to prolong the torture). Social/Sharing |
About the Owner
|
Contact the OwnerUse can use a contact form to send an email to this gallery owner,
|
You must be logged in to make comments.
Peter Sullivan ![]()
Member Since 2006
Posted on 12/14/2020
I will buy the rejected cover for that price. It should be cheaper though, as it was not considered good enough to publish. Lol.
E DLS ![]()
Member Since 2005
Posted on 12/14/2020
Peter Sullivan wrote:
I will buy the rejected cover for that price. It should be cheaper though, as it was not considered good enough to publish. Lol.
But you could say the same thing about the Kirby unpublished Thor cover. As far as not being good enough. We don't know that. It could have been an editorial decision and nothing to do with the quality of the art (which is not half bad, if you ask me).
Peter Sullivan ![]()
Member Since 2006
Posted on 12/14/2020
E DLS wrote:
But you could say the same thing about the Kirby unpublished Thor cover. As far as not being good enough. We don't know that. It could have been an editorial decision and nothing to do with the quality of the art (which is not half bad, if you ask me).
I was joking. The reasons behind rejecting one version of a cover over another is purely editorial. Some very strange decisions were made. For example I much prefer Ditkos first version of Spider-Mans first appearance to the Kirby one. I always presumed it was because Lee liked Kirbys work more.
E DLS ![]()
Member Since 2005
Posted on 12/14/2020
Peter Sullivan wrote:
I was joking. The reasons behind rejecting one version of a cover over another is purely editorial. Some very strange decisions were made. For example I much prefer Ditkos first version of Spider-Mans first appearance to the Kirby one. I always presumed it was because Lee liked Kirbys work more.
Assuming the cover was actually "rejected". Unpublished could simply mean that the artist may have just changed his mind and decided to do another version. But I agree with you about strange editorial choices. I've seen so many unpublished covers that looked better than what was actually used. Just look at Jim Shooter's track record. LOL!
All |
|
![]() |
| Howard Chaykin Dominic Fortune #1 Story Page 21 Or |
| JOHN BUSCEMA AND JOE SINNOTT SILVER SURFER #1 PAGE 1 TITLE SPLASH! ORIGIN OF THE SILVER SURFER! |
| Frank Miller and Klaus Janson - Daredevil #190, Page 28 - Resurrection of Elektra! |
| HARDWARE #4 ORIGINAL ART TITLE SPLASH PAGE 3 BY DENYS COWAN. |
Classified Updates |
|
Robert Hughes1/23/2026 7:28:00 PM |
|
Monty B1/23/2026 5:37:00 PM |
|
Mugen R.1/23/2026 4:52:00 PM |
|
ComicLINK.Com Auctions1/23/2026 4:47:00 PM |
|
NELSON H1/23/2026 3:11:00 PM |
|
ENRIQUE ALONSO1/23/2026 2:36:00 PM |
|
Dealer Updates |
|
RomitaMan Original Art1/24/2026 5:27:00 AM |
|
Coollines Artwork1/23/2026 9:53:00 PM |
|
Koch Comic Art1/23/2026 7:20:00 PM |
|
Anthony's Comicbook Art1/23/2026 4:51:00 PM |
|
ComiConArt1/23/2026 3:57:00 PM |
|
Catskill Comics1/23/2026 2:15:00 PM |
|
|
|