E DLS UNITED STATES
Member Since March 2005
134 Artworks | Watched by 298

Star Wars, Yoda #1 variant cover by Ken Lashley

Location: New Stuff
Artist: Ken Lashley (All)

140  Views  -  22  Comments  -  15  Likes

Additional Images

published cover

Regular edition cover by Phil Noto
Artwork Details
Location: New Stuff
Title: Star Wars, Yoda #1 variant cover by Ken Lashley
Artist:  Ken Lashley (All)
Media Type: Pen and Ink
Art Type: Cover
For Sale Status: NFS
Views: 140
Likes on CAF: 15
Favorited on CAF: 1
Comments: 22
Added to Site: 3/30/2026

Share This Artwork
Description
Such a waste.


If you just want to cut to the chase, you can go to the Additional Images and see the published cover. Then you'll understand what I mean. Whether it was the Art Director or the title Editor, whoever was responsible for the decision to only feature about 30% of the original artwork probably needs to have their head examined.

Even though I'm not one to make a big deal about published vs. unpublished art (yes, I understand it makes a difference to many collectors and does affect price and investment potential), if you ARE going to use something an artist has put his heart and soul into, have the decency and respect to feature that artwork in the best possible light. Not butcher it to suit some misguided editorial whim. I would have no problem with that published version IF THAT'S HOW IT WAS DRAWN. But the fact that it only features 30% of the artist's beautiful work is nothing short of criminal. They didn't even do him the courtesy of including his signature on the cover. Anyway, thank goodness for original art I guess.

I'd be lying if I told you that I'd been on the hunt for a nice Ken Lashley piece for a while. In fact, probably the only reason I was ever exposed to his work was during the massive Age of Apocalypse crossover in the X-titles back in the mid 90's. By then, I had already abandoned Excalibur because Alan Davis had left the book for the second and final time. But during the crossover event, all the X-books went through a temporary 4-month title change to more easily group all the corresponding issues. So after issue #86, for 4 months Excalibur became X-Calibre. The 4 issues were written by Warren Ellis and drawn by Lashley (except #2). What I didn't know at the time (again, since I had already stopped reading Excalibur) was that X-Calibre represented the end of a much longer run by Ken that began in issue #70. It's funny but when I picked up the first issue of X-Calibre, I actually thought Ken was a new artist. Haha!

Anyway, as much as I enjoyed those X-Calibre issues, it still never motivated me to follow Ken's work afterwards. I would notice different things from time to time. But like I said, it was never a matter of, hey, I need to get a Ken Lashley piece for my collection. That is, until I saw this piece. Okay, yes, the primary reason it got my attention was because it was a Star Wars piece. But it was a very pleasant surprise for me to find out that the artist was a familiar name from the past. Especially since, stylistically, it really doesn't look anything like his work on Excalibur/X-Calibre. I just thought it was a kick ass Yoda piece. I loved the action pose, I loved his grim and determined facial expression, I loved all the detail, and I loved the energy of the piece.

Yoda's introduction and the pivotal role he played in Empire was obviously a major event in the SW franchise. But as much as I loved the practical incarnation of the character (and the great work of legendary puppeteer Frank Oz), no one was more excited about him going 100% CGI in the prequels than me. I think everyone understood the limitations of a puppet character. And they in turn understood the limitless possibilities of CG. Nowhere was this more evident than in the epic light saber duel between Yoda and Dooku in Attack of the Clones. When Yoda whips out his green light saber at the beginning of that scene, I went absolutely nuts! For me, this cover brings back all the fun, excitement, and energy of that battle.

But even though I love all things Star Wars, I just don't have a ton of SW artwork. So being able to score this piece was a huge thrill for me. I still feel bad that Ken's gorgeous (and hard) work wasn't completely featured on the published cover. But who gives a crap? I have the original art in all its glory. And this piece is nothing short of glorious.

Thanks for stopping by to take a look.

About The Owner

Thank You For Supporting CAF!
E DLS ( 3 )
Badges: Premium Gallery Owner
Member Since: March 2005
Last Login: April 2026
Country: UNITED STATES
On CAF:
Premium Member Q&A
E's Want List
Artworks Commented On
Liked Art
Site Activity

Read More About E DLS
Contact E DLS

Login or register for an account to email the owner of this artwork.

Comments on this Artwork

You must be logged in to make comments.
J. Hiroshi Morisaki Member Since 2005
Posted On 3/30/2026

Ha! Nice one! Such a li'l bad @$$... And I agree that this got cropped mercilessly and for no good reason. Thanks for sharing the uncropped version for us all to enjoy.

E DLS Member Since 2005
Posted On 3/30/2026

J. Hiroshi Morisaki wrote:
" Ha! Nice one! Such a li'l bad @$$... And I agree that this got cropped mercilessly and for no good reason. Thanks for sharing the uncropped version for us all to enjoy. "

RIGHT???  I understand the mandatory requirement for logo space on a cover piece (which there is on the original anyway).  But in looking at the published cover, there is so much space between the logo and his head.  As you said, there was really no reason to drop the artwork down so far.  Thanks for the comment Hiro.

John C Member Since 2014
Posted On 3/30/2026

All the tentacles were cropped out. The horror, the horror.

E DLS Member Since 2005
1    
Posted On 3/30/2026

John C wrote:
" All the tentacles were cropped out. The horror, the horror. "

I know!  What do they have against tentacles?  Unless the editor was nervous about any perceived hentai undertones.  Hmm, I may never look at Doc Ock the same way again.

James S Member Since 2017
Posted On 3/30/2026

Well, love that we get to see Ken's original vision of the art with this post!

West Stephan Member Since 2007
1    
Posted On 3/30/2026

Yesterday, I watched Empire Strikes Back for the first time with my 3 boys. Still one of the best sci-fi movies ever made!

E DLS Member Since 2005
Posted On 3/31/2026

West Stephan wrote:
" Yesterday, I watched Empire Strikes Back for the first time with my 3 boys. Still one of the best sci-fi movies ever made! "

First of all, I'm going to assume when you say "the first time", you mean as a shared experience with your sons and not the first time you have ever seen the movie.  That is so great and I am actually quite envious.  With any experience, there can only be one first time.  Which is what makes them so special.  No matter how much you enjoy or love something, there is nothing like the first time.  And it applies to the art we all love and collect.  No matter how long we've owned a piece of art or how many times we've looked at it, nothing matches the first time you saw it.  Which is why I love it when people visit and look through my collection.  Because even if I can never have that first time moment again, being able to see it in someone else's eyes is the next closest thing.  I'm sure when you watched the movie with your boys, you were paying more attention to them and seeing the pure joy, excitment, and awe in their faces.  So happy that you were all able to share that moment together.

Kavi H Member Since 2018
Posted On 3/30/2026

Man that zoom/crop on the published is a damn shame! I think I saw this image first as original art somewhere (can't remember if on dealer/rep site or an auction site but somewhere), and didn't really connect the dots with that published image until now. The published cover still looks good in a vaccum had I never see the art but I vastly prefer Ken's full artistic vision for this Yoda cover as you and I'm sure most art collectors would. And I'm with you as someone who greatly enjoyed CGI Yoda saber fighting in the prequels! Nice to see this appear in your collection, it will be May before we know it and a new Star Wars movie will be in theaters this time around!
E DLS Member Since 2005
1    
Posted On 3/30/2026

Kavi H wrote:
" Man that zoom/crop on the published is a damn shame! I think I saw this image first as original art somewhere (can't remember if on dealer/rep site or an auction site but somewhere), and didn't really connect the dots with that published image until now. The published cover still looks good in a vaccum had I never see the art but I vastly prefer Ken's full artistic vision for this Yoda cover as you and I'm sure most art collectors would. And I'm with you as someone who greatly enjoyed CGI Yoda saber fighting in the prequels! Nice to see this appear in your collection, it will be May before we know it and a new Star Wars movie will be in theaters this time around!  "

Damn!  Should've thought about holding this back for a May 4th post.  I guess I'll have to go out and buy another Star Wars piece before then.  Ha!  Thanks for the comment buddy!

Will K Member Since 2006
Posted On 3/30/2026

Guessing Yoda was cropped because you'd see he's wearing pants. Eehh... cropped it is.  Editor Sith is. 

E DLS Member Since 2005
Posted On 3/30/2026

Will K wrote:
" Guessing Yoda was cropped because you'd see he's wearing pants. Eehh... cropped it is.  Editor Sith is.  "

Jedi Masters don't wear pants?  I don't remember Qui-Gon or Mace Windu going commando.  Anyway, I don't think that applied to the CG Yoda.  Just the puppet Yoda (because he had Frank Oz's hand up his butt).

George H Member Since 2009
Posted On 3/30/2026

Wow, they really left a lot of great art out on the published cover. Really great work from Lashley!

artless artmore Member Since 2013
Posted On 3/30/2026

Super cover!  It's great to see the whole image.  I wonder if there was some issue with continuity re the way Lashley drew Yoda's body or if it was just an editorial decision to go for a close-up on his head

Jim Warden Member Since 2003
Posted On 3/31/2026

Had I not seen the original artwork, I would have thought the published cover looked fine; after seeing the entire image I agree that it was a terrible decision to crop out so much of Ken Lashley's finely detailed work.  Ken has really grown as an artist since those Excalibur days; congratulation on adding this terrific cover to your incredible collection!

E DLS Member Since 2005
Posted On 3/31/2026

Jim Warden wrote:
" Had I not seen the original artwork, I would have thought the published cover looked fine; after seeing the entire image I agree that it was a terrible decision to crop out so much of Ken Lashley's finely detailed work.  Ken has really grown as an artist since those Excalibur days; congratulation on adding this terrific cover to your incredible collection! "

You pretty much echoed what I said in my description.  If the published variant was drawn that way, fine.  But obviously that wasn't the case.  What bothers me so much (which is kind of silly since I'm not even the artist) is that the editor didn't tell the artist what he wanted/needed.  If all they wanted for the cover was a headshot, that should have been made clear when they hired Ken for the job.  Instead of letting him go to town on this incredible piece and then wasting all that hard work.  Sure he would've gotten paid either way, but that's not the point here.  Anyway, thanks for the comment buddy.

F M Member Since 2005
Posted On 3/31/2026

I really like the rendering on his face and hands.

Jeffrey Wedding Member Since 2009
Posted On 3/31/2026

This issue had a number of covers, and as published this one didn't grab me at all. But here, I like it more than the primary cover that Noto did. Nice pick up!

E DLS Member Since 2005
1    
Posted On 3/31/2026

Jeffrey Wedding wrote:
" This issue had a number of covers, and as published this one didn't grab me at all. But here, I like it more than the primary cover that Noto did. Nice pick up! "

Thanks Jeff.  It's funny, but before you mentioned the Noto cover, I never even bothered to look up the regular version of the published cover.  Now I love Noto as much as the next guy, but when I finally saw it, for me it wasn't even close.  Not sure how many variants were done for this issue but between this (OA version) and the Noto, it's a no-brainer for me.  But I still think Marvel missed an opportunity to put a great cover on the stands by not using the entire image.

Chris Snorek Member Since 2009
Posted On 3/31/2026

Cropping all that detail is just nuts. Great work by Lashley per usual.
Paul Roach Member Since 2014
Posted On 4/1/2026

It is strange to cut that much good artwork. I can only assume that the editor has a 'series look and feel' to adhere to, but the loss on the bottom section is a shame. At least you still have it here in the original, shared with the community! Great, determined Yoda face as well.

Jimmy Cawley Member Since 2015
Posted On 4/3/2026

post you must

Scott M Member Since 2003
Posted On 4/4/2026

Wonderful likeness and detail!

You must be logged in to make comments.