Tom McDonald UNITED STATES
Member Since March 2019
70 Artworks | Watched by 41

Dynamic Batman Bronze-Age Action - Mike Nasser 1978

Location: DC Fan Boy
Artists: Mike  Nasser (Penciller) ,  Mike  Netzer (Penciller) ,  Joe Rubinstein (Penciller)

43  Views  -  15  Comments  -  4  Likes

Additional Images

Published Page

There are three stories, and they are Spectacular!
Artwork Details
Location: DC Fan Boy
Title: Dynamic Batman Bronze-Age Action - Mike Nasser 1978
Artist:  Mike  Nasser (Penciller) ,  Mike  Netzer (Penciller) ,  Joe Rubinstein (Penciller)
Media Type: Pen and Ink
Art Type: Interior Page
For Sale Status: NFS
Views: 43
Likes on CAF: 4
Comments: 15
Added to Site: 4/23/2026

Share This Artwork
Description

If I were trapped on an island with only a handful of comics, one of them would be the Batman Summer Spectacular from 1978. It had three stories drawn by three fantastic Batman artists – Marshall Rogers, Michael Golden, and Mike Nasser.

It was easy to label Nasser as a Neal Adams clone. But Nasser’s layouts were even more experimental than Adams’s, stretching limbs to make characters look dynamic and sleek, bending bodies into extreme poses, defying gravity, and stylizing faces to a specific mood rather than anatomical accuracy, with a bit of zip-a-tone – an ideal example of Batman Bronze-age perfection.

About The Owner

Contact Tom McDonald

Login or register for an account to email the owner of this artwork.

Comments on this Artwork

You must be logged in to make comments.
Steven Dilworth Member Since 2012
Posted On 4/24/2026

I remember this book.  I loved it.  Always a BIG Nasser fan.  I have to admit, it was likely because I was a big Adams' fan as well.  I loved everyone who drew in that style.  It was just so amazing.  Anyway, the character was 8 years away from being created, but it strikes me that Batman's face in panel two looks a lot like The Tick!

Marcus Wai Member Since 2005
Posted On 4/24/2026

Nasser really took experimentation far with that last panel as the action goes from right to left instead of the normal left to right.

Steven Dilworth Member Since 2012
1    
Posted On 4/24/2026

Marcus Wai wrote:
" Nasser really took experimentation far with that last panel as the action goes from right to left instead of the normal left to right. "

I know.  It's confusing at first, then you realize it follows the position of Batman's body from the panel above.  The weight's stay on the same side of the page, and his motion flows up as it would with the viewer remaining on the same side of the action.  Very cinematic.

Tom McDonald Member Since 2019
Posted On 4/24/2026

Marcus Wai wrote:
" Nasser really took experimentation far with that last panel as the action goes from right to left instead of the normal left to right. "
Very astute observation. Thanks
Steven Dilworth Member Since 2012
1    
Posted On 4/24/2026

I found it.  This is the cinematic principle Nasser was following:

 

"Don't cross the line" refers to the 180-Degree Rule, a fundamental filmmaking principle for maintaining spatial consistency. It dictates that an imaginary axis exists between two characters (or subjects) in a scene, and the camera must remain on one side of this line to keep their relative positions and eyelines consistent. 

Key Aspects of the 180-Degree Rule:

  • Purpose: Keeps the audience oriented so that characters appear to be facing each other, with one looking left and the other looking right.
  • The "Line": An imaginary line connecting the subjects (e.g., in a conversation, a line between their eyes).
  • Consequence of Breaking: If the camera crosses over this line ("jumps the line"), the characters' positions appear reversed, disorienting the audience.
  • Intentional Breaks: While usually avoided to prevent confusion, directors may intentionally break the rule to heighten chaos, create tension, or show a power shift.
  • Alternative Terminology: The line can be established by the subjects' eyelines or their direction of movement. 

To maintain continuity, all cameras should stay within the 180-degree arc on one side of this axis. 

Tom McDonald Member Since 2019
1    
Posted On 4/24/2026

Steven Dilworth wrote:
" I found it.  This is the cinematic principle Nasser was following:
 
"Don't cross the line" refers to the 180-Degree Rule, a fundamental filmmaking principle for maintaining spatial consistency. It dictates that an imaginary axis exists between two characters (or subjects) in a scene, and the camera must remain on one side of this line to keep their relative positions and eyelines consistent. 
Key Aspects of the 180-Degree Rule:
  • Purpose: Keeps the audience oriented so that characters appear to be facing each other, with one looking left and the other looking right.
  • The "Line": An imaginary line connecting the subjects (e.g., in a conversation, a line between their eyes).
  • Consequence of Breaking: If the camera crosses over this line ("jumps the line"), the characters' positions appear reversed, disorienting the audience.
  • Intentional Breaks: While usually avoided to prevent confusion, directors may intentionally break the rule to heighten chaos, create tension, or show a power shift.
  • Alternative Terminology: The line can be established by the subjects' eyelines or their direction of movement. 
To maintain continuity, all cameras should stay within the 180-degree arc on one side of this axis.  "
Thanks for posting that, Steven. I was a news cameraman in college and remember learning that rule the hard way.
Ron S Member Since 2007
1    
Posted On 4/24/2026

Wow!  What a callback.  Great book with great stories!  Excellent page! 

Steve Day Vich Member Since 2007
1    
Posted On 4/24/2026

What a great looking sequence to add to the collection. You can fille the pressure of that weight.

West Stephan Member Since 2007
1    
Posted On 4/24/2026

Congratulations on scoring this dynamic page!

Nils E Member Since 2014
2    
Posted On 4/24/2026

So important Joe Rubenstein inked this, would not have been the same with Vince Colletta!

Steven Dilworth Member Since 2012
Posted On 4/24/2026

Nils E wrote:
" So important Joe Rubenstein inked this, would not have been the same with Vince Colletta! "

So true.  I know Vince was a master of getting things done on time, but the figures would have lost a lot of their weight and fullness without Joe.

Tom McDonald Member Since 2019
Posted On 4/24/2026

Nils E wrote:
" So important Joe Rubenstein inked this, would not have been the same with Vince Colletta! "
I have vowed never to own a Colletta page.
1    
Posted On 4/24/2026

great page tom, i also love the little bit lf zip, just perfectly placed

Kavi H Member Since 2018
1    
Posted On 4/24/2026

Killer page (makes my arms and shoulders hurt just by looking at it, but it is great)!!! congrats on landing a page from one of your deserted island comic books!

1    
Posted On 4/24/2026

Gorgeous!

You must be logged in to make comments.