Log In Register
Victor Lim UNITED STATES
Member Since January 2008
569 Artworks | Watched by 34

FLASH GORDON COVER BY GIL KANE RECREATED BY DAN ADKINS

Location: Dan Adkins

1578  Views  -  1  Comment  -  1  Likes

Artwork Details
Location: Dan Adkins
Title: FLASH GORDON COVER BY GIL KANE RECREATED BY DAN ADKINS*
Artist:  None Specified
Media Type: Pen and Ink
Art Type: Interior Page
For Sale Status: NFS
Views: 1578
Likes on CAF: 1
Comments: 1
Added to Site: 8/27/2009

Share This Artwork
Description
FLASH GORDON COVER BY GIL KANE RECREATED BY DAN ADKINS
FLASH GORDON #2, the 1960's King Comics issue. Dan Adkins didn't have anything to do with the original cover, but wanted to ink Gil Kane again, something he hasn't done for many years. Back in the 60's and 70's, Dan inked Kane's Warlock and Captain Marvel, as well as many other stories and covers.

So to be clear, this is an original 2009 drawiing, pencilled and inked by Dan Adkins, a recreation of a 1960's cover pencilled and inked by Gil Kane. The art measures 11 by 15.5 inches, with almost an inch border all around, on a sheet of 100 lb strathmore bristol board.

In my opinion, Dan's version is slightly better than Gil's. I don't mean to downgrade Kane's talent, but he rarely inked his own work, concentrating on his excellent pencilling skills. Dan specialized in inking for most of his career. Look at the monster's teeth and his foot under his head. Dan's inking is just sharper overall.

As usual with Dan's originals, there isn't a blemish or a speck of white-out.

About The Owner

Thank You For Supporting CAF!
Victor Lim
Badges: Premium Gallery Owner
Member Since: January 2008
Last Login: July 2026
Ebay Id: viclimax
Country: UNITED STATES
On CAF:
Artworks Commented On
Liked Art
Site Activity
Contact Victor Lim

Login or register for an account to email the owner of this artwork.

Comments on this Artwork

You must be logged in to make comments.
Mark Yanko Member Since 2009
Posted On 11/10/2009

Dan did a beautiful job. I'm sure you're thrilled to own this. Who wouldn't be?